Assessment Score Descriptors

Each criterion is assessed on a 0–20 scale.
Scores reflect degree of conformity with the published standard — not personal style or aesthetic preference.


1. Structural Harmony (0–20)

Definition:
The extent to which the treatment outcome aligns with natural anatomy, hair growth patterns, and facial structure.

Score Descriptors

  • 18–20 (Exceptional)
    Outcome demonstrates precise alignment with natural structure. Shape enhances features without distortion or tension. No evidence of forced direction.
  • 15–17 (Strong)
    Clear structural alignment with minor adjustments possible. Overall harmony is maintained and supports wearability.
  • 12–14 (Adequate)
    Basic structural alignment present, though some elements appear imposed rather than guided by natural form.
  • Below 12 (Insufficient)
    Outcome conflicts with natural structure, resulting in distortion, imbalance, or reduced wearability.

2. Symmetry & Balance (0–20)

Definition:
The degree of proportional consistency and visual balance across corresponding areas.

Score Descriptors

  • 18–20 (Exceptional)
    Outcome displays natural, proportional balance. Asymmetries are intentionally managed rather than forced into uniformity.
  • 15–17 (Strong)
    Overall balance is consistent with minor, non-disruptive variation.
  • 12–14 (Adequate)
    Symmetry is present but inconsistently maintained or overly rigid.
  • Below 12 (Insufficient)
    Noticeable imbalance or forced symmetry that disrupts refinement.

3. Softness & Flexibility (0–20)

Definition:
The extent to which the result retains movement, comfort, and absence of rigidity.

Score Descriptors

  • 18–20 (Exceptional)
    Outcome remains flexible and comfortable with natural movement throughout the treatment lifespan.
  • 15–17 (Strong)
    Minor firmness may be present but does not compromise comfort or appearance.
  • 12–14 (Adequate)
    Flexibility is reduced; stiffness becomes noticeable during wear.
  • Below 12 (Insufficient)
    Outcome is rigid, uncomfortable, or visibly overprocessed.

4. Wearability (0–20)

Definition:
How effectively the outcome integrates into everyday, low-maintenance use.

Score Descriptors

  • 18–20 (Exceptional)
    Result performs consistently in makeup-free, professional, and daily contexts with minimal maintenance.
  • 15–17 (Strong)
    Wearable in most settings with occasional adjustment.
  • 12–14 (Adequate)
    Requires regular styling or product to remain presentable.
  • Below 12 (Insufficient)
    Poor day-to-day performance; result interferes with routine or comfort.

5. Longevity Readiness (0–20)

Definition:
The degree to which the outcome is designed to age evenly and maintain integrity over time.

Score Descriptors

  • 18–20 (Exceptional)
    Outcome demonstrates clear planning for even fade, growth, and sustained balance.
  • 15–17 (Strong)
    Minor degradation expected but overall structure remains stable.
  • 12–14 (Adequate)
    Longevity is limited by technique, condition, or aftercare alignment.
  • Below 12 (Insufficient)
    Result deteriorates rapidly or unevenly, indicating poor longevity readiness.

Overall Interpretation

  • 90+RFI Signature
  • 85–89RFI Advanced
  • 80–84RFI Conformant
  • Below 80Does not meet accreditation threshold

Important Notes

  • Scores are applied to outcomes, not individuals.
  • High scores require consistency, not isolated results.
  • No single criterion compensates for deficiency in another.

The Qelvea Refined Finish Index™

Refinement measured with clarity, consistency, and care.