Misuse & Enforcement

Qelvea Refined Finish Index™

Qelvea Standards is committed to protecting the integrity, clarity, and public understanding of the Qelvea Refined Finish Index™ (RFI).

This page explains what constitutes misuse of the RFI and how enforcement is applied.


Purpose of Enforcement

Enforcement exists to:

  • prevent misrepresentation of the RFI
  • protect licensed users who comply with the standard
  • avoid consumer confusion
  • maintain confidence in a private professional framework

Enforcement is applied proportionately and consistently.


What Constitutes Misuse

Misuse of the RFI includes, but is not limited to:

Misrepresentation of Status

  • claiming accreditation where none exists
  • continuing to reference accreditation after expiry, suspension, or withdrawal
  • overstating the scope or level of recognition

Unauthorised Use

  • using the RFI name, wording, or marks without a valid licence
  • displaying badges or logos outside the licensed period
  • use by third parties not covered by the licence

Misleading Implications

  • implying regulation, government approval, or endorsement
  • describing the RFI as a certification or guarantee
  • using prohibited wording contrary to Approved Advertising Wording

Improper Presentation

  • removing required disclaimers
  • presenting accreditation in a way likely to mislead
  • combining RFI references with exaggerated or comparative claims

How Misuse Is Identified

Misuse may be identified through:

  • routine monitoring
  • reports from professionals or members of the public
  • review of marketing materials
  • verification of public register listings

All reports are reviewed objectively.


Enforcement Approach

Enforcement is graduated and proportionate, taking into account:

  • nature of the misuse
  • intent
  • duration
  • impact on public understanding

Typical steps may include:

  1. Clarification or Correction Request
  2. Formal Notice
  3. Suspension of Licensed Use
  4. Withdrawal of Accreditation
  5. Application of Unauthorised Use Fees

Not all cases require progression through every stage.


Unauthorised Use Fees

Where applicable, unauthorised use fees may be applied to reflect:

  • administrative costs
  • governance time
  • reputational impact

Such fees:

  • represent a genuine pre-estimate of cost
  • are not penalties
  • are applied only where reasonable and proportionate

Effect of Suspension or Withdrawal

Where accreditation is suspended or withdrawn:

  • all references to the RFI must cease immediately
  • logos, wording, and marks must be removed
  • public register listings may be updated or removed

Failure to comply may result in further enforcement action.


Reporting Misuse

Concerns relating to misuse may be reported via the Contact page.

Reports should include:

  • details of the alleged misuse
  • supporting information where available

Reports are handled confidentially and proportionately.


Appeals & Review

Enforcement actions may be reviewed in accordance with the Appeals & Complaints process.

Reviews consider:

  • whether procedures were followed correctly
  • whether enforcement was proportionate

They do not reassess stylistic or professional judgement.


Limitations

Enforcement under the RFI:

  • does not constitute regulation
  • does not replace legal remedies
  • relates solely to administration of a private professional standard

The Qelvea Refined Finish Index™

Protecting clarity through proportionate enforcement.

START


Potential Misuse Identified

├─ Source:
│ • Routine monitoring
│ • Public or professional report
│ • Register review


Initial Review
(Objective, evidence-based)

├─ Is there a credible issue?
│ │
│ ├─ NO → Case closed (no action)
│ │
│ └─ YES


Misuse Categorised

├─ Minor / Correctable
├─ Moderate
├─ Extended
└─ Deliberate / Repeated


Proportionate Response Selected

├─ Clarification or Correction Request

├─ Formal Notice Issued

├─ Suspension of Licensed Use

├─ Withdrawal of Accreditation

└─ Application of Unauthorised Use Fee


Corrective Action Required

├─ Misuse corrected?
│ │
│ ├─ YES → Case resolved
│ │
│ └─ NO


Escalation (If Necessary)

├─ Further enforcement action
├─ Additional fees (where proportionate)
└─ Register update or removal


Right to Review
(Appeals & Complaints Process)

├─ Procedural review only
├─ Proportionality assessed
└─ Final decision issued


END

KEY PRINCIPLES

Enforcement is graduated and proportionate

Fees are administrative, not penalties

Payment does not grant or reinstate licensed use

Appeals assess procedure, not aesthetic judgement

The RFI is a private professional standard